How much does it cost to run a computer monitor?
Computer monitors are display devices that convert electrical signals into visual output, and their energy consumption depends heavily on screen size, brightness settings, and panel technology. Unlike the cathode-ray tube monitors of the 1990s, modern LCD and LED displays are far more efficient, though many users unnecessarily run them at maximum brightness or leave them powered during idle periods, driving up unnecessary costs over time.
Computer Monitor running cost calculator
- Per day
- $0.05
- Per month
- $1.13
- Per year
- $13.60
- CO₂ / year
- 32 kg
Based on 80 kWh per year. Adjust the price per kWh to match your latest electricity bill for an exact figure.
At 40 watts used 8 hours a day, a computer monitor costs about $0.05 per day, $1.13 per month and $13.60 per year on an average rate of 17¢ per kWh — roughly 80 kWh and 32 kg of CO₂ over a year. Enter your own electricity rate and usage in the calculator above for a figure matched to your bill.
The actual power draw of your monitor varies dramatically based on how you use it rather than which model you own. Brightness is the single largest factor—running at 100 percent brightness can nearly double energy consumption compared to a comfortable 50 percent setting. Most office environments and homes have adequate ambient light that makes maximum brightness wasteful; adjusting your monitor to match your room's lighting conditions is one of the few free efficiency gains available. Panel size matters too, but less than people expect; a 27-inch monitor often draws only 10-15 watts more than a 24-inch, so upgrading to a larger screen for productivity reasons typically has minimal impact on total runtime cost.
The type of panel technology has become largely irrelevant from an energy perspective. IPS, VA, and TN panels all consume comparable amounts of power in modern designs. What does matter is the monitor's age and manufacturing standards. Monitors manufactured before 2015 often use 50-60 watts or more even at modest settings, while current EPEAT-certified or Energy Star labeled models typically hover in the 25-40 watt range. If your monitor is more than eight years old, the energy savings from replacement could outweigh the capital cost within a few years, especially in heavy-use environments.
Many people mistakenly believe that turning off a monitor's backlight with sleep mode significantly reduces costs, but in practice this provides minimal savings since the monitor already draws very little power in that state. The real opportunity lies in preventing unnecessary runtime altogether. Closing your monitor during lunch breaks, after work, or when stepping away for extended periods eliminates consumption entirely. A monitor turned on for eight hours daily but actively used for only six hours is wasting roughly 25 percent of its annual operating cost. Organizations and home offices that treat monitor shutdown as a standard practice often see measurable reductions in their electronics category spending.
When selecting a new monitor, ignore the 'power consumption' spec sheets published by manufacturers—they typically reflect lab conditions at minimal brightness and are rarely representative of real-world use. Instead, look for monitors with standard energy certifications (Energy Star, EPEAT Gold) and ask vendors specifically about power consumption at 75 percent brightness, which more closely matches how people actually work. Also consider your actual screen size needs rather than defaulting to the largest available; a 24-inch monitor is sufficient for most text-based work, spreadsheets, and typical office tasks, and the modest power savings compound over the monitor's 5-7 year lifespan. Matte or anti-glare screens are also worth considering because they reduce the need to increase brightness to combat reflections.
One often-overlooked factor is monitor count. Many professionals run two or three monitors simultaneously, and each additional display adds its full power draw to your daily consumption. Before expanding your setup, honestly assess whether multiple monitors genuinely improve your productivity or simply expand your workspace out of habit. For many roles, a single larger monitor or a well-organized single screen does the job. If you do use multiple displays, applying the brightness and shutdown discipline mentioned above becomes even more important, since small percentage savings multiply across three devices.
Frequently asked questions
- Does leaving my monitor on standby overnight or over a weekend cost much?
- No, not measurably. Modern monitors in sleep or standby mode consume only 0.5-2 watts, which over a full weekend amounts to a negligible fraction of a cent. The real cost driver is active use. That said, if you have a dozen monitors across an office and many are left in standby daily, the cumulative drain adds up. More importantly, developing the habit of powering off completely takes no extra effort and is better for hardware lifespan than thermal cycling from repeated on-off cycles.
- Is a 4K monitor significantly more expensive to run than a 1080p monitor?
- Not by much. A 4K monitor typically draws 5-10 watts more than a comparable-sized 1080p model because the backlight needs to work harder to push more pixels. However, the price difference between 4K and standard resolution is driven far more by the cost of the higher-resolution panel itself than by any difference in operating cost. The energy penalty for 4K is so modest that it should never be the deciding factor in your purchase decision.
- Why does my monitor use power even when nothing appears on screen?
- The backlight—the LEDs or other light source behind the screen—is always on whenever your monitor is powered, regardless of what image is being displayed. Even a black or blank screen requires the backlight to operate continuously. The only way to stop this consumption is to put the monitor into true sleep mode or power it off completely. This is why darkening your desktop wallpaper to black colors provides no real energy savings; the backlight still runs at the same intensity.
- Should I unplug my monitor at night to save energy, or is that unnecessary?
- Unplugging is unnecessary for energy savings—powered-off monitors draw virtually nothing, and the inconvenience of unplugging daily isn't worth it for most home users. However, if you're comfortable with your monitor's power button location and use patterns, simply turning it off via the button is sufficient. Unplugging can extend hardware lifespan by eliminating phantom power and reducing thermal stress, so it's reasonable if convenience permits, but energy-wise the benefit is negligible.
- Can I reduce monitor costs by using an older, smaller screen I have lying around?
- Possibly, but not necessarily. Older monitors from the 1990s and 2000s may draw 50-80 watts, while a new 24-inch monitor draws 25-35 watts. Even though the old monitor is smaller, its outdated technology means it likely costs more to run. A brand-new basic monitor is almost always cheaper to operate than a device-drawer relic, and you'll gain better image quality, ergonomics, and reliability as benefits.
- Does using a monitor with a touchscreen increase power consumption significantly?
- Touchscreen monitors do draw slightly more power due to the capacitive sensors and additional electronics, typically 5-8 watts more than an equivalent non-touch display. However, touchscreen functionality is rarely relevant for traditional desk-based computer use; the added cost and power overhead are difficult to justify for most office and home office applications. Reserve touchscreen displays for specialized use cases like kiosks or collaborative displays.